Pole Position: Charles Leclerc
1st: Max Verstappen
2nd: Charles Leclerc
3rd: Lewis Hamilton
Bonus Prediction: Both VCARBs in Q3
-
With the first race just days away, now is a great time to predict the championship standings. I have deliberately avoided seeing anyone else’s predictions, so am relying on testing, reports and social media reports to come up with these predictions.
Constructors Championship:
10: Sauber
As well as having a really poor sponsorship I wrote an article about, Sauber didn’t inspire much hope during testing. I expect a tough couple of seasons before Audi takes over the team.
9: Haas
I am taking a risk by not putting Haas last. But despite the general pessimism from the team, I’m betting on both Haas and Sauber not scoring many points, so it should only take one good result to swing the standings. I would not be surprised to see a surprise finish from Hulkenberg that would prevent Haas from finishing last again.
8: Alpine
In F1 testing Alpine looked like they could be the slowest team. Reports hint that the car is overweight and lacks downforce. Yes, the team should develop throughout the year but I don’t suspect them to develop fast enough to escape the lower midfield.
7: Williams
Albon proved last year that he can deliver consistently and singlehandedly won Williams seventh last year. For Williams to secure this position though, Logan Sargeant needs to perform. Sargeant had a really poor season last year, only scoring one point to Albon’s twenty-seven. But, if the Williams is a more stable car, hopefully Sargeant can score some better results to be top of the lower midfield.
6: Visa Cash App RB
Whilst having a ridiculous name, the VCARB impressed at pre-season testing. I expect them to occupy the position Alpine did last year, not challenging the top teams, but removed from the cars behind them..
5: Aston Martin
Alonso’s long run pace was quite impressive at pre-season testing. Whilst few expect a repeat of last year, where Aston Martin launched as the second fastest car, I do believe that they’ll be competing with the other top teams for podiums. They may even develop into one of the fastest cars. However, I cannot in good conscience put them any higher than fifth, due to the presence of Lance Stroll. He had a pretty terrible season last year and I expect this form to continue. But, if Stroll can turn his performances around, Aston could challenge for the top three places.
4: McLaren
I published an article at the beginning of the year doubting McLaren’s ambitions to be a Red Bull challenger. I based this upon the fact that McLaren had a history of making overly ambitious targets before their car had tested. Their long run pace appears to have vindicated me, as they look quite a way behind Red Bull and Ferrari. Whilst the track characteristics of Bahrain would exaggerate the deficit, as the McLaren was best in high-speed tracks last year, I think it unlikely that McLaren will immediately be challenging for race wins. However, as they have proven over the last two years, the team has a knack for in season development. This will likely save their season and despite my doubts, I do hope to see some McLaren race wins this year.
3: Mercedes
I expect Mercedes to have a very track specific car, as they have for the last couple of years, but probably with higher highs than the last two years. I think Mercedes, McLaren and possibly Aston Martin will be locked in a season long battle for third. But I think Mercedes has the best driver line up and Lewis Hamilton and George Russell should both be able to get wins if the car allows it.
2: Ferrari
Ferrari’s long run pace at the pre-season testing looked impressive. They do not look that far off Red Bull. I still expect Red Bull to be champions yet am optimistic that Ferrari will get a number of race wins this year.
1: Red Bull
The RB20 looks intimidating. Max Verstappen did not look to have any degradation in his long run pace and the team may have even found the W13’s missing downforce. A combination of another dominant car and the best driver in F1 should deliver them a relatively easy constructors’ championship.
Drivers Championship:
- Max Verstappen
- Charles Leclerc
- Sergio Perez
- Lewis Hamilton
- Fernando Alonso
- Carlos Sainz
- Lando Norris
- George Russell
- Oscar Piastri
- Daniel Ricciardo
- Yuki Tsunoda
- Lance Stroll
- Alex Albon
- Esteban Ocon
- Pierre Gasly
- Logan Sargeant
- Nico Hulkenberg
- Valtteri Bottas
- Zhou Guanyu
- Kevin Magnussen
Bold Predictions:
- Lando Norris wins his first race, then gets disqualified after the race.
- Alex Albon gets a podium for Williams.
- Lewis Hamilton will win one of his last five races for Mercedes.
- At least one Grand Prix will be cancelled due to unforeseen circumstances.
- Charles Leclerc will get more pole positions than Max Verstappen.
-
Note: This article uses the Teammate Performance Index I created, for more information see Introducing The Teammate Performance Index
I originally planned to write this post after seeing some murmuring on Carlos Sainz possibly losing his seat on Twitter. I wanted to show how Carlos did not deserve to lose his seat, by comparing his results to Charles Leclerc’s over the past three seasons. Leclerc, in my opinion, is one of the rising stars of F1 and will almost certainly be a world champion. Other than Verstappen, he is the most exciting young driver in the sport. Yet, Sainz has compared reasonably well to Leclerc, more than most people were expecting. Yet, Sainz did lose his seat. He did not deserve it, but can take some solace to the fact that he only lost his seat to F1’s statistically most successful and marketable driver. But, this article is not about Sainz’s replacement, this is to pay tribute to the fantastic job Carlos has done. So, with no ado, Sainz’s scores on the Teammate Performance Index.
Leclerc Sainz Wins 3 2 Poles 16 5 Podiums 18 16 Points (Excl. Sprints+FL) 632 567.5 Point Positions 53 54 Qualifying H2H 43 23 Race H2H 39 27 DNF/S/Q’s 10 9 Fastest Laps 3 2 Championships 0 0 And converted to percentage.
% Leclerc Sainz Wins 60% 40% Poles 76.19% 23.81% Podiums 52.94% 47.06% Points (Excl. Sprints+FL) 52.69% 47.31% Point Positions 49.53% 50.47% Qualifying H2H 65.15% 34.85% Race H2H 59.09% 40.91% DNF/S/Q’s [Flipped] 47.37% 52.63% Fastest Laps 60% 40% Championships 50% 50% Average 57% 43% Sainz scores reasonably well against Leclerc. Whilst Leclerc has a clear speed advantage, as shown by his domination of Sainz in the pole statistics and qualifying head to heads, on every other measure, Sainz performs with 40% or higher. He has finished in the points more times than Leclerc and has scored 47% of Ferrari’s points over the time. Sainz’s overall average is 43%, far higher than a typical No. 2 driver.[1] This score firmly places Sainz into the category of an equal first driver.
By way of comparison, Leclerc’s first teammate, Sebastian Vettel, was a four-time world champion. Whilst past his prime by the time Leclerc was his teammate, Vettel was still considered one of the strongest F1 drivers, having taken ten wins in the previous two seasons and even seeming like a championship contender for the first half of both seasons. Yet, when Leclerc became Vettel’s teammate, he found himself humbled, as is shown by the statistics.
Leclerc Vettel Wins 2 1 Poles 7 2 Podiums 12 10 Points (Excl. Sprints+FL) 358 271 Point Positions 28 23 Qualifying H2H 25 13 Race H2H 21 17 DNF/S/Q’s 7 5 Fastest Laps 4 2 Championships 0 0 Or in percentage terms.
% Leclerc Vettel Wins 66.67% 33.33% Poles 77.78% 22.22% Podiums 54.55% 45.45% Points (Excl. Sprints+FL) 56.92% 43.08% Point Positions 54.90% 45.10% Qualifying H2H 65.79% 34.21% Race H2H 55.26% 44.74% DNF/S/Q’s [Flipped] 41.67% 58.33% Fastest Laps 66.67% 33.33% Championships 50% 50% Average 59.03% 40.97% Vettel performed worse against Leclerc than Sainz on most metrics. Leclerc dominated Vettel in qualifying slightly more than he did to Sainz, but Vettel also falls back on points, only receiving 45% of the team’s points. Whilst slightly outperforming Sainz in race head-to-heads, Vettel had far more peaks and troughs than Leclerc. Vettel also faced a Leclerc who was new to Ferrari and had only spent one previous season in F1, whilst Sainz entered a Ferrari seen by many as Leclerc’s team. Yet, Vettel’s average was 41%, still less than Sainz would achieve.
Yet, Sainz is now embarking upon his final season with Ferrari. Their car looks beautiful and if testing is to be believed, it seems fast as well. Ferrari should count themselves lucky that they have two drivers performing at a similar level. If their gamble to sign Hamilton does not pay off, they may regret dropping Sainz in the future, especially if he ends up in a rival team. Because other teams are looking at the same statistics that we are and recognize that Sainz is incredibly talented. Be it Audi, Mercedes or Red Bull, they should all heavily consider signing Carlos.
[1] I am currently engaged in data collection for F1’s no 2s, expect to see that article in a month or so, but rest assured, most have far worse statistical results than Sainz.
-
There’s nothing more fun in the world than messing around with statistics, is a fun way of admitting that I have a limited social life.
Regardless, I do enjoy the occasional statistical model, so I made my own, the Teammate Performance Index. This measures ten different statistics between teammates, weights each one to 10% and finds an overall percentage performance between the drivers. Whilst the categories are completely made up based on personal preference and are weighted towards successful drivers (as wins, poles and championships are included), but my hope is that when I collect a wide range of drivers, it will create a clearer picture as to driver performance. Whilst the statistics will not be treated as gospel, as they are made up for fun, it will help to broaden opinions if used as a tool to compare driver performances.
With no ado, here is a template of the index.
Driver One Driver Two Wins Poles Podiums Points (Excl. Sprints&FL) Point Positions Qualifying H2H Race H2H DNF/S/Q’s Fastest Laps Championships Wins:
This is self-explanatory, compare the number of wins each driver has over their time as teammates.
Poles:
Compare the number of poles each driver has over their time as teammates.
Podiums:
Compare the number of podiums each driver has over their time as teammates.
Points (Excluding Sprints and Fastest Laps):
Compare the points each driver has over their time as teammates. I excluded the sprints as they have only been in F1 for a few years, so are not a fair comparison to make between eras. I also exluded the fastest laps, both for this reason and because when fastest laps are later included as a category. I will use the modern points system between eras, as it creates a consistent value for each position and a consistent percentage gap between 1st and 2nd place.
Point Positions:
The amount of times a driver finished in the points paying positions. I am not using the modern points system for this category, as there is limited value applied to the position itself and the points have expanded as the reliability of the cars have expanded. Additionally, it also allows for both the modern points system and past points systems to be represented in the data of the model.
Qualifying Head-to-Head:
How many times each driver beat the other in qualifying before grid penalties are applied.
Race Head-to-Head:
How many times each driver beat the other in the races. I am including one driver finishing and the other not in the statistics, both due to the frequency of retirements before the modern era of F1 leading to the data set becoming incredibly small to compare drivers to and because many times a retirement is in part or in full that drivers fault, so should be considered as part of performance.
Did Not Finish, Did Not Start, Did Not Qualify, Disqualified:
The amount of times each driver met one of these conditions during their time as teammates. Unlike the other categories, the percentage is flipped when measuring it, so if the result was 2-1, the driver with 2 would receive 33.3% and the driver with 1 would receive 66.6%
Fastest Laps:
Compare the number of fastest laps each driver got during their time as teammates. For the classic era, when multiple drivers may have received fastest laps due to inaccurate timing data, all drivers will be considered to have had one fastest lap.
Championships:
How many championships each driver has. To note, if drivers receive 0-0 on any of the categories, they will both receive 50% as default, despite the fact that is not actually how maths works when dividing with zero. However, it is the most useful way of expressing the data in the model. Of course, this balances the model towards successful teams and drivers, as there are more complete data sets to work with, but I want to put my focus on comparing the more successful drivers, at the present time.
So, this is my new model. Its flaws will likely become apparent as I collect more data for it, but should be a fun way of looking through an comparing the statistical record. The next article I am writing will use this model, hence my introduction of it today.
-
I appear to be the only person in the world who likes the new Alpine livery. In my opinion, it’s an improvement on the previous design, as I thought that the pink and blue clashed too much. By minimizing those colours and making black the dominant colour on the livery, it feels sleeker to me. Yet most fans were disappointed with the livery. The primary reason is that carbon fiber is being overused to save weight on current F1 cars. Removing colour from a livery when every other team is also doing that frustrates people, leading to calls for rules to be introduced to prevent the practice.[1]
Yet, I suspect a second factor helps explain why the reaction to Alpine’s livery seemed the most negative. Since buying Lotus in 2015, Renault have failed to meet the targets that they set, been involved in unnecessary drama and are unable to maintain consistency between seasons. Assessing Renault’s performances and dramas over years shows a team seemingly in constant disarray.
2016:
Renault reentered F1 in 2016 with ambition. Taking over the Lotus team that they had previously sold, the team announced that they were embarking upon a ‘five-year plan’, with senior officials expressing that they would expand their operations to challenge for podiums by 2018 and the title by 2020.[2] However, by inheriting a team that needed to be rebuilt, 2016 was always going to be a difficult year for Renault. Both drivers never qualified in the top ten and the team finished 9th, only ahead of Sauber and Manor. The only particular highlight of the year was Kevin Magnussen’s impressive drive from 17th to 7th at the Russian Grand Prix, defending from a train of faster cars in the process.[3] Whilst Renault developed the car somewhat at the start of the season, by the middle of the year they had shifted their focus to the 2017 aero rules, Renault boss Cyril Abiteboul remaining hopeful that with an improved aero department, their five year plan was still on track to achieve success.[4]
2017:
2017 was a much more positive year for Renault. New driver Nico Hulkenberg regularly qualified in the top ten and finished the British, Belgian and Abu Dhabi grand prix as best of the rest.[5] The team were making progress, jumping from 9th to 6th in the championship. Yet, Hulkenberg’s teammate, Jolyon Palmer, had a horrific year, only finishing in the points once. This led to Palmer being dropped before the season finished, to be replaced by Carlos Sainz, who had already been signed for 2018.[6] Whilst this may have seemed a smart move to secure 6th in the championship, it is also an early hint of a problem that would haunt Renault in later years, their ability to mismanage and disrespect their drivers.
Regardless, at the time, it appeared that the five-year plan was on track. 2018 could prove an important year for the team, as it would test their ability to make good on their promises, challenge for podiums and reach the top of the midfield.
2018:
2018 was a year of mixed fortunes for Renault. They achieved their ambition of being top of the midfield and attracted Daniel Ricciardo, then considered one of the best drivers in F1, to drive for them in 2019.[7] Both drivers regularly finished in the points, with Hulkenberg finishing best of the rest in six races, with Sainz also doing so at the season finale at Abu Dhabi. Yet, whilst representing steady progress, the team did not get anywhere close to their stated ambition of podiums in 2018, in fact only finishing in the top five twice.[8] Thus, whilst in his article for The Race Edd Straw argues that the plan appeared to be on course, evidence he provides contradicts this, with former chief technical officer Bob Bell sounding the alarm that five years was the minimum and that it may take longer for Renault to challenge.[9]
The plan had been somewhat disrupted. Yet, with a top driver joining the team, hopes were high that progress could be made. The worst thing Renault could do at this point would be to move backwards.
2019:
In 2019, Renault moved backwards, from 4th to 5th in the championship. Whilst they received 122 points in the previous year, in 2019 they fell to 91. Whilst the team placed their hope in a series of upgrades introduced at the French GP, these failed to make a notable improvement in performance. Once this had happened, it was recognized that the plan was not on track, leading to a reshuffle, wherein Dirk de Beer was hired as head of aerodynamics and Pat Fry was hired for his engineering expertise.[10] No podiums were achieved in the year and points finishes proved irregular. However, the team did have a day-of-days at the 2019 Italian Grand Prix. The team finished 4th and 5th that day, beating the Red Bulls on pace and Ricciardo only finished ten seconds behind Lewis Hamilton in 3rd. This was Renault’s best performance since reentering F1 in 2016. This at least was a sign that Renault were improving, holding out hope that they may start to challenge for podiums soon.
2020:
By 2020, few held hope that Renault could challenge for the title. The Formula One website ranked Renault only 5th in their pre-season rankings after testing.[11] And between testing and the season opener, Daniel Ricciardo decided to sign with McLaren for 2021. This gravely upset the higher ups at Renault, with team boss Cyril Abiteboul consistently stating that Ricciardo owed the team his loyalty.[12] Abiteboul even dramatized this saga, appearing on Drive to Survive painting Ricciardo as the villain, who had a commitment to stay with Renault and had broken that commitment. This is despite the fact that Ricciardo only signed with Renault for two years. So contractually, he owed Renault nothing. Cyril came across like a desperate boyfriend who could not accept that he was being broken up with. Furthermore, this attitude towards their drivers did not only affect Cyril, as would become apparent in 2022.
All the drama distracts from the fact that Renault had a comparatively fantastic 2020. Whilst still finishing 5th, they were far more competitive than the previous year, challenging for 3rd in the championship to season’s end. The team finished in the top five nine times and finally achieved podiums, two years behind schedule. Two 3rd places for Ricciardo and a career-best 2nd place in the penultimate race for Esteban Ocon provided hope that the team would continue to improve. With two-time world champion Fernando Alonso coming on board, Renault had signed one of the strongest drivers in F1. With a rebrand to becoming the Alpine F1 team, the absolute worst thing the team could do would be to make another unrealistic plan.
2021:
Alpine’s 2021 began with the announcement that long-term team boss Cyril Abiteboul had departed the team. Along with this announcement came the appointment of Laurent Rossi as Alpine’s new CEO.[13] Unfortunately, Rossi had not learned from mistakes made under the previous regime. He decided to announce that Alpine had a 100-race plan ‘that places us on the podium as many times as possible in 2024. From today in fifth, you can easily find a roadmap.’[14] Rossi set a target of season-by-season improvement, which would later come to be his undoing when this target did not materialize.[15]
2021 itself was a year of mixed fortunes for Alpine. They were not as competitive as they had been in the previous season, with Ferrari and McLaren delivering faster cars that allowed them, not Alpine, to fight for 3rd. However, the team delivered upon a shock win at the 2021 Hungarian Grand Prix, their finest moment since reentering F1. After lining up in eighth, a series of unfortunate collisions and a strategy error from Mercedes left Esteban Ocon in the lead. Under pressure from Sebastian Vettel all race, Ocon controlled the race at the front and made no costly errors. Yet, throughout the race, Lewis Hamilton had been charging from the back of the field and a win still looked possible. Unfortunately for him, Alpine had Fernando Alonso in between Hamilton and the race lead. Alonso, utilizing all his talent, made his car as wide as possible and defended on the edge, holding Hamilton up for nine laps. This solidified the race win for Ocon, proved Alpine had made an inspired choice when they signed Alonso and seemed to signal a brighter future for the team.
2022:
2022 appeared to be an hopeful year for Alpine in the first half. They came into the new regulations with a quick car, which Alonso used to contend for pole in Australia and Canada. Whilst not quite a top team, this appeared to many, for example Finley Crebolder of Planet F1, like Alpine’s 100-race plan was working.[16] Yet, performance is only one measure of running a successful F1 team and the events of the summer showed that Alpine lacked the managerial skills needed.
Fernando Alonso is one of the greatest drivers in the history of F1. Even in his 40s, he is still delivering at a sublime level. Any team that has Fernando as a driver should do their upmost to keep him happy. Unfortunately, Alpine learnt what happens when you don’t. Alonso had frequently expressed his desire to race for many more years in F1, yet Alpine were only willing to sign a 1+1-year deal with Alonso, with a view to transferring him to their sportscar programme.[17] This was because they saw their rookie driver, Oscar Piastri, as the team’s long-term future. Alonso, in response to what he saw as disrespect, signed for Aston Martin as soon as a seat became available. Yet, as the team had been certain that they would sign with Alonso for 2023, they were obliged to find Piastri an F1 seat earlier in the year. The only seat they were willing to loan him to was Williams, which Piastri found an unattractive prospect.[18] Therefore, when he became a free agent, Piastri signed with Alpine’s rival, McLaren. When Alonso then left the team, Alpine were left with no available driver. They then decided to announce that Piastri was driving for them without his permission, in what appeared to be an attempt to pressure Piastri into taking the seat.[19] This included the team boss, Otmar Szafnauer, walking in on Piastri in the simulator and announcing that he was driving for the team, in front of people who did not know Piastri’s contractual situation.[20] This led to Piastri having to publicly tweet that he was not driving for the team, which caused an internet firestorm.[21] This controversy have been worth it, if Alpine had a legal case to sign Piastri, yet when the case went to the Contract Recognition Board, they ruled that Piastri’s only valid F1 contract was with McLaren.[22] After the fact, Otmar Szafnauer showed that Cyril’s reaction to Ricciardo leaving reflects a wider cultural problem in the team of disrespect for their employees. Otmar in many interviews painted Piastri as disloyal, selfish and ungrateful, implying that he would regret his decision.[23] This entire situation embarrassed Alpine, who successfully managed to alienate two star-quality drivers and were shown to lack the maturity to manage a top F1 team.
2023:
When launching their car in 2023, Alpine were still following the 100-race plan. Otmar expressed a desire to improve in the standings and ‘be closer to third than fifth… even if we stay fourth, we’ve got to make progress.’[24] However, Alpine would finish the season in sixth, being leapfrogged by Aston Martin and McLaren, who both managed to become regular podium contenders. Tensions escalated throughout the year, as CEO Laurent Rossi described his team’s performance as amateurish, which came across as highly demotivating and yet another sign of disrespect towards employees of the team.[25] And by the end of the year, everyone associated with the 100-race plan was out of the team, including Rossi and Szafnauer, effectively leaving the plan abandoned.[26] Whilst 2023 was not all bad, as the team achieved two podiums, setting unrealistic goals once again backfired in the team’s face and led to another reshuffle.
Thus, Alpine enters 2024 afresh, with new leadership in the form of Bruno Famin. The early signs are hopeful, as Famin was clear in a conversation with Lawrence Barretto that he did not want to set specific targets as ‘sometimes in F1 you go two steps forward and one step backwards.’[27] Obviously, the team still has ambitions to get to the front of F1, they are the Renault works team, with a heritage of success in the 90s and 2000s. Yet, this quote presents some hope that the team have learnt from past failings, that the era of unrealistic plans has come to an end.
[1] Should F1 introduce new livery rule over increasing issue?, Ewan Gale, RacingNews365 (7 February 2024) https://racingnews365.com/should-f1-introduce-new-livery-rule-over-increasing-issue
[2] Bob Bell: Renault’s rebuild means F1 title in five years is “not unrealistic”, Motorsport.com (23 August 2016) https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/bob-bell-renaults-rebuild-means-f1-title-in-five-years-is-not-unrealistic/3221283/; Renault halts 2016 F1 car development, Jonathan Noble, Motorsport.com (21 July 2016) https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/renault-halts-2016-f1-car-development-800573/800573/
[3] F1: Russian Grand Prix – as it happened, Tom Davies, The Guardian (1 May 2016) https://web.archive.org/web/20160504180816/http://www.theguardian.com/sport/live/2016/may/01/f1-russian-grand-prix-live
[4] Renault halts 2016 F1 car development https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/renault-halts-2016-f1-car-development-800573/800573/
[5] In 2017/18/19, best of the rest refers to the highest finishing driver outside of Mercedes, Ferrari and Red Bull.
[6] Jolyon Palmer out at Renault, Carlos Sainz in, after Japanese GP, Jonathan Green & James Galloway, Sky Sports F1 (8 October 2017) https://www.skysports.com/f1/news/12433/11070504/jolyon-palmer-out-at-renault-carlos-sainz-in-after-japanese-gp
[7] Ricciardo to join Hulkenberg at Renault for 2019 (3 August 2018) https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/headlines/2018/8/ricciardo-joins-hulkenberg-at-renault-in-2019.html
[8] Renault halts 2016 F1 car development https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/renault-halts-2016-f1-car-development-800573/800573/; Bob Bell: Renault’s rebuild means F1 title in five years is “not unrealistic” https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/bob-bell-renaults-rebuild-means-f1-title-in-five-years-is-not-unrealistic/3221283/
[9] Why Renault’s Five-Year F1 Plan Failed, Edd Straw, The Race (21 October 2020) https://www.the-race.com/formula-1/why-renaults-five-year-f1-plan-failed/
[10] Failed French Grand Prix upgrade triggered Renault F1 reshuffle, Jonathan Noble, Autosport (14 November 2019) https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/failed-french-grand-prix-upgrade-triggered-renault-f1-reshuffle-4985837/4985837/
[11] F1 POWER RANKINGS: From 10 to 1 – revisiting how we ranked the teams after winter testing (30 June 2020) https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article.f1-power-rankings-from-10-to-1-revisiting-how-we-ranked-the-teams-after.3NhOSQN07l1E1b90evIyo5.html
[12] ‘Unity and commitment are critical’ say Renault as Ricciardo split announced (14 May 2020) https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article.unity-and-commitment-are-critical-say-renault-as-ricciardo-split-announced.2Lcj1J7kTz0c85fGXG3KBC.html
[13] Cyril Abiteboul leaves Renault and will not lead Alpine F1 team, Matt Morlidge, Sky Sports F1 (12 January 2021) https://skysports.com/f1/news/12433/12185143/cyril-abiteboul-leaving-renault-and-will-not-lead-alpine-f1-team
[14] ‘It’s a 100-race project’ – CEO Laurent Rossi outlines Alpine’s roadmap to reach the summit of F1 (16 October 2021) https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article.its-a-100-race-project-ceo-laurent-rossi-outlines-alpines-roadmap-to-reach.2TA0a4d491WWAjbuzsDTzw.html
[15] It’s a 100-race project’ – CEO Laurent Rossi outlines Alpine’s roadmap to reach the summit of F1 https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article.its-a-100-race-project-ceo-laurent-rossi-outlines-alpines-roadmap-to-reach.2TA0a4d491WWAjbuzsDTzw.html
[16] With Alpine, Renault’s plans finally seem to be on track, Finley Crebolder, Planet F1 (14 July 2022) https://www.planetf1.com/features/alpine-renault-plans-finally-on-track
[17] ANALYSIS: Why Alonso accepted Aston Martin’s advances and signed a shock deal – and why it could be a perfect match, Lawrence Barretto (1 August 2022) https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article.analysis-why-alonso-accepted-aston-martins-advances-and-signed-a-shock-deal.2hSAZ2QtgVtuEJa4chM7c4.html
[18] Piastri’s Not a Villain- Trust and Loyalty go Both Ways, Scott Mitchell-Malm, The Race (1 September 2022) https://www.the-race.com/formula-1/piastris-not-a-villain-trust-and-loyalty-go-both-ways/
[19] Piastri’s Not a Villain- Trust and Loyalty go Both Ways https://www.the-race.com/formula-1/piastris-not-a-villain-trust-and-loyalty-go-both-ways/
[20] Oscar Piastri: New McLaren signing opens up on ‘bizarre and upsetting’ Alpine F1 exit and team behaviour, Matt Morlidge, Sky Sports F1 (3 September 2022) https://www.skysports.com/f1/news/12433/12688414/oscar-piastri-new-mclaren-signing-opens-up-on-bizarre-and-upsetting-alpine-f1-exit-and-team-behaviour
[21] https://twitter.com/OscarPiastri/status/1554527452231262210?lang=en
[22] Piastri to race for McLaren in 2023 following CRB decision (2 September 2022) https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article.breaking-piastri-to-race-for-mclaren-in-2023-following-crb-decision.6jDE57LmqHCyrd7yKx1BLZ.html
[23] Alpine boss Szafnauer responds to CRB ruling and Piastri’s ‘bizarre and upsetting’ comments (3 September 2022) https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article.alpine-boss-szafnauer-responds-to-crb-ruling-and-piastris-bizarre-and.ZXLvO8h9mqbUwzwVdsU3H.html, Alpine reopen Piastri wound with new jab: “Eliminate the loopholes…”, James Dielhenn, Crash.net (3 February 2023) https://www.crash.net/f1/news/1019808/1/alpine-reopen-piastri-wound-new-jab-eliminate-loopholes, Alpine chief predicts Oscar Piastri’s F1 career will “perish” after defecting to McLaren, Daniel Moxon, Daily Mirror (22 December 2022) https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/formula-1/oscar-piastri-mclaren-alpine-szafnauer-28798786
[24] Alpine unveils 2023 F1 challenger in London, Filip Cleeren, Autosport (16 February 2023) https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/alpine-unveils-2023-f1-challenger-in-london/10433120/#:~:text=Alpine’s%202023%20ambition%20is%20to,to%20third%20than%20to%20fifth%22.
[25] Alpine boss blasts F1 team’s performance as ‘amateurish’ at times, Jonathan Noble & Benjamin Vinel, Autosport (7 May 2023) https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/alpine-boss-blasts-f1-teams-performance-as-amateurish-at-times/10466340/
[26] Is Alpine’s 100-race F1 dream finally over? Brivio latest to leave Enstone, Cambridge Kisby, Motorsport Magazine (12 December 2023) https://www.motorsportmagazine.com/articles/single-seaters/f1/alpine-f1s-poisoned-chalice-szafnauer-latest-to-be-axed/#:~:text=In%202021%2C%20Alpine%20CEO%20Laurent,title%2Dcontending%20outfit%20in%202024
[27] ANALYSIS: Alpine’s plan to avoid another lonely finish in the F1 constructors’ standings, Lawrence Barretto (8 February 2024) https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article.analysis-alpines-plan-to-avoid-another-lonely-finish-in-the-f1-constructors.2WtNsRCq5rSNDnvFth6Tn1.html
-
F1’s newest team has arrived, the Stake F1 Team. Sponsored by the gambling website Stake, the name instantly courted controversy, many noting that the team would have to change its name in countries with strict policies on gambling advertising.[1] Still, their international social media presence strides forward promoting the brand, utilizing their trademark colours on most of their posts, offering competitions and giveaways, all on an Instagram page with more than double the followers of the Stake page itself. This in-your-face advertising for gambling pushes against a recent trend in the UK, where widespread acknowledgement that gambling in sports is harmful is starting to emerge. Recent examples include Premier League teams being pressured to remove these adverts from the front of shirts by the 2026/27 season and banning betting ads during live sports broadcasts.[2] Yet, like in the 90s with tobacco advertising, F1 seems to be swimming against the current trend.[3] Thus, one of the ten faces of F1 is an online, cryptocurrency-based gambling company. The rest of this article will examine these three elements, cryptocurrency-based gambling, online gambling and gambling itself, to explain why this move is deeply problematic.
Firstly, cryptocurrency-based gambling is a terrible business model, even by the standards set by gambling companies. Whilst most reporting on the issue has characterized this form of gambling as being banned in the UK, the full picture is even more enlightening.[4] Whilst there is no specific law banning use of cryptocurrencies for gambling, any operator attempting to use them needs to prove that they comply with anti-money laundering and safe gambling measures.[5] However, as the value of cryptocurrencies fluctuates so much and are commonly linked to illegal activities ‘there have been no instances of licensed operators making this declaration [that they comply with Gambling Commission regulations] and accepting deposits directly in cryptoassets.’[6] They fundamentally break the rules of fair play, as customers have no guarantee that their winnings have any consistent value, meaning that these customers would essentially be gambling twice, on the gambling product itself and on the earnings from that product. Thus, when trying to access Stake from the UK, you are redirected to their UK website, which does not use cryptocurrency. Yet many people can find out how to use a VPN to bypass this. And whilst Stake’s terms ban the use of VPNs, Stake simultaneously sponsors articles that explain how to use a VPN to bypass security checks.[7] Furthermore, a recent report from The Observer found how easy it was to bypass these safeguards, utilizing a VPN to access their website and a picture of throat sweets as age verification.[8] For 48 hours, the reporters were able to illegally gamble, countering Stake’s claims that their safeguards were robust.[9] Additionally, when advertising for Everton, Stake used their international brand [rather than the UK website] on the front of player’s shirts and gave away free crypto giveaways to Everton fans.[10] This does not come across as a company genuinely concerned with following UK rules and regulations, providing primary evidence that Stake needs to be pushed out of sports advertising.
Secondly, whilst not illegal in the UK, I personally have a problem with the way online gambling creates a space that fuels addiction. Whilst the majority of people who gamble, both in-person and online, do so safely, there is evidence that online gambling increases problem-gambling. NHS statistics indicate that whilst 5.8% of those who had gambled in the past 12 months engaged in at-risk or problem gambling, this figure increases to 18.2% when solely focusing on online gambling.[11] This makes sense, as online gambling is far easier to access than traditional forms. If one were addicted to casino-based gambling, one would have to choose to get up, get changed, walk or drive to the casino, walk in the building, talk to multiple people, be visibly present gambling at that casino and then return home. In this process, there are a number of safeguards that loved ones can take to help the individual avoid addictive behavior. When traditionally gambling, there has to be a physical space to access, incentives to go to that place and people that have to be interacted with in order to participate in addictive behaviors. Loved ones can take measures to bar the individual from that space, remove incentives they see, find out the locations of casinos in the local area and provide support to prevent relapses. On the contrary, with online gambling, all one needs to do is access the internet and gamble their money away. It is far harder to regulate this space, due to the instantaneousness of the process, the wide variety of gambling options available and the speed in which a relapse can happen. Someone could wake up, open their phone, see an advertisement, click on it, play a few games and lose thousands of pounds, all before brushing their teeth. Whilst the government does not want to ban online gambling, partially due to fears that this would encourage a black market, I would concur that online gambling removes the geographic aspect that allows for potentially dangerous behaviors to be regulated.[12] I would further concur that if their was a widespread product that allowed for people to instantly access alcohol directly from their phone, with no physical limitations, there would be instant calls for this to be banned to protect those with alcohol addiction.[13] Whilst a slightly absurd hypothetical, this is essentially the space that online gambling allows gambling addicts to access. Because of this, I would personally be in favor of heavily regulating, if not banning, online gambling and believe that one of the first steps that needs to be taken is kicking online gambling advertisers out of sports.
Finally, gambling advertising in of itself is problematic. I arrived at this position through empathy with those who are impacted when they see this advertising, those with a history of addiction. Research varies on the extent to which problem gambling is prevalent in the UK, figures varying from 0.3%, to 0.7%, to 2.7%.[14] A minimum of 300,000 people in the UK are problem gamblers, with a further 1.8 million at risk.[15] For those who have struggled with gambling addiction, seeing advertising can be incredibly harmful and triggering to them.[16] I believe that people with a history of gambling problems should have a right to watch and enjoy sports without risk of triggers and relaspes. Whilst the gambling industry claims to take problem gambling seriously, 43.5% of money spent on gambling in the UK is at from at-risk or problem gambling, so I doubt the sincerity of these claims.[17] There is no easy solution to this problem, as when gambling exists, there will naturally be some advertising for it. But this in-your-face advertising across popular sports, on the shirts of football players, or all over an F1 car, has to be stopped. If not, those with a history of gambling addiction are being denied the right to watch their favorite sports, or risk relapsing.
So, for these reasons, one should not be surprised to know that I’ll be rooting against the Stake F1 Team. It is never my wish to be overtly negative, but when I see a car that is advertising so many pernicious ideas pull off the road and retire, I’ll feel relieved that I won’t have to see it for the rest of the race. Besides, their livery looks like if Ben 10 drove a Formula One car. Bold, at the very least, but I’m not a fan.
[1] Stake F1 Team’s Gambling Links Could Be Problematic, Saajan Jogia, Sports Illustrated (3 January 2024) https://www.si.com/fannation/racing/f1briefings/news/stake-f1-teams-gambling-links-could-be-problematic-sj4
[2] Premier League clubs agree to withdraw gambling sponsorships on front of shirts, Sky Sports (13 April 2023) https://www.skysports.com/football/news/11095/12856367/premier-league-clubs-agree-to-withdraw-gambling-sponsorships-on-front-of-shirts; Children Unable to See Betting Ads During Live Sport, Betting and Gaming Council (11 September 2020) https://bettingandgamingcouncil.com/news/w2w-football
[3] Blair intervened over F1 tobacco ban exemption, documents show, Rachel Stevenson, The Guardian (12 October 2008) https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2008/oct/12/tonyblair-labour
[4] How UK gambling safeguards fail to defend online punters, Rob Davies & Matei Rosca, The Observer (1 October 2022) https://www.theguardian.com/business/2022/oct/01/uk-gambling-safeguards-no-match-for-online-bookie-stake-com; What’s at Stake? A crypto casino’s shady marketing tactics revealed, Matei Rosca, Reporter.London https://reporter.london/?p=490
[5] Policy Paper: High stakes: gambling reform for the digital age, Department for Culture, Media and Sport, Gov.UK (27 April 2023) https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/high-stakes-gambling-reform-for-the-digital-age/high-stakes-gambling-reform-for-the-digital-age
[6] High stakes: gambling reform for the digital age https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/high-stakes-gambling-reform-for-the-digital-age/high-stakes-gambling-reform-for-the-digital-age
[7] What’s at Stake? A crypto casino’s shady marketing tactics revealed https://reporter.london/?p=490
[8] How UK gambling safeguards fail to defend online punters https://www.theguardian.com/business/2022/oct/01/uk-gambling-safeguards-no-match-for-online-bookie-stake-com
[9] How UK gambling safeguards fail to defend online punters https://www.theguardian.com/business/2022/oct/01/uk-gambling-safeguards-no-match-for-online-bookie-stake-com
[10] What’s at Stake? A crypto casino’s shady marketing tactics revealed https://reporter.london/?p=490
[11] Health Survey for England, 2021 Part 2: Gambling behaviour, NHS England (16 May 2023) https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/health-survey-for-england/2021-part-2/gambling#:~:text=According%20to%20their%20Problem%20Gambling,and%201.1%25%20of%20women
[12] High stakes: gambling reform for the digital age https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/high-stakes-gambling-reform-for-the-digital-age/high-stakes-gambling-reform-for-the-digital-age
[13] More than merely ordering drinks from delivery services, which at least requires some human interaction through the deliveries, if alcohol was instantly available, this technology would likely face instant bans.
[14] Experts warn of £12.6bn scale of UK gambling problem, Paul McInnes, The Guardian (27 April 2017) https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2017/apr/27/12-billion-pounds-scale-uk-gambling-problem-experts-warn; UK gambling addiction much worse than thought, says survey, Rob Davies, The Guardian (19 May 2020) https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/may/19/uk-gambling-addiction-yougov-research; Health Survey for England, 2021 Part 2: Gambling behaviour https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/health-survey-for-england/2021-part-2/gambling#:~:text=According%20to%20their%20Problem%20Gambling,and%201.1%25%20of%20women
[15] High stakes: gambling reform for the digital age https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/high-stakes-gambling-reform-for-the-digital-age/high-stakes-gambling-reform-for-the-digital-age
[16] High stakes: gambling reform for the digital age https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/high-stakes-gambling-reform-for-the-digital-age/high-stakes-gambling-reform-for-the-digital-age
[17] High stakes: gambling reform for the digital age https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/high-stakes-gambling-reform-for-the-digital-age/high-stakes-gambling-reform-for-the-digital-age
-
I began watching F1 in 2020. At the time, I knew little about the sport and my opinions were underdeveloped. One example of which was my opinion on Alex Albon. Seeing him get dominated by Max Verstappen every weekend convinced me that he was not a very good F1 driver. When he was replaced by Sergio Perez, who had won a race in 2020, I thought that Red Bull had signed a far more competitive driver, as I had yet to truly appreciate just how good Max Verstappen was.
2021 helped adjust my views. Seeing Perez, a driver I was convinced was one of the best in the sport, be beaten by Verstappen as comprehensively as Albon was, began to make me believe that Albon was unlucky to have Max as a teammate. I was, therefore, glad to see that Albon got Williams drive in 2022 and appreciative that Red Bull were dedicated to finding him a seat in the sport.[1] However, I did not expect that two years later, I would be cheering Alex on every weekend, repping him in my F1 fantasy team and listening to podcasts featuring him.[2] Yet, thanks to his performances, level-headedness and personality, this is exactly what occurred.
Australia 2022:
Albon’s performance at the 2022 Australian Grand Prix piqued my interest. It was only his third race for Williams and he scored a point. After witnessing George Russell’s long saga of trying to get a point for Williams, which culminated in him crying on live TV after finally scoring, seeing Alex almost immediately get points was at the very least amusing.[3] I recall joking the next day that it was like Russell had taken the long slog to Mordor only for Albon to instantly use the eagles to get there. Yet, the manner in getting these first points was what particularly impressed me. After starting at the back, Albon proceeded to drive on one set of hard tyres for the entire race, only pitting on the last lap, overcutting many drivers in the process to finish tenth.[4] Managing a new specification of Pirelli tyres, only in their third race, after spending a year out from the sport, was highly impressive and showed that Albon’s talent was unfulfilled in his time at Red Bull. This drive earned him praise, with the team subsequently coining him the ‘tyre whisper’.[5] My soft spot for Albon emerged here and would only continue to grow.
Belgium 2022:
Later in the season, Albon’s Belgium performance impressed me. The Williams was the least competitive car in 2022 but had the advantage of great straight-line speed. The team used this to their advantage in Belgium by running an extremely low downforce setup, sacrificing speed in the corners to be quicker in a straight line.[6] Albon delivered on the car’s resulting one lap pace to start in sixth position in the race. Despite high tyre degradation on the Williams, Albon was able to utilize the car’s top speed to hold on, defending from a train of five faster cars towards the end of the race.[7] This showed that Albon was able utilize the good characteristics of the car to achieve points when possible, even if rarely. After a season of Williams continuing to struggle to score, this was a refreshing result.
Canada 2023:
In 2023, Williams had a more competitive car that was able to fight frequently in the midfield. Despite this, they were still last in the championship with one point after the Spanish Grand Prix.[8] Yet at the following round in Canada, Albon would achieve his best result at Williams yet. After topping second qualifying, after making a bold call to run on slick tyres on a drying track, Albon lined up in ninth for the race. Following an early safety car, the team pitted Alex, gambling on a one stop strategy. Whilst two stopping was faster in Canada, this would give Albon track position, but would require heavy tyre preservation and defensive driving. Alex had 58 laps to run on his tyres, one of the longest stints in the race. The two-stoppers began rapidly closing in on Alex throughout the race.[9] Consequently, a train of seven faster cars caught Alex, who had to defend for over 20 laps. Yet as he did in Belgium, Alex was able to make this Herculean task look easy. A combination of great strategy, tyre whispering, a daring defense and self-confidence, earned Alex the driver of the day vote from F1 fans.[10] Even more importantly, this was the drive that truly cemented me as an Alex Albon fan.
From his performance in Canada, the points came flooding throughout the rest of the season, as Albon singlehandedly catapulted Williams to seventh in the championship. Highlights included beating both Ferraris to eighth in Silverstone, qualifying fourth in the Netherlands (and then overcoming a bad strategy to finish the race in seventh) and qualifying sixth and finishing seventh in Italy. In one of F1’s more predictable seasons, Albon provided most of the entertainment and was one of the most impressive drivers in the field. Now, on to Albon’s third year with Williams. The livery released today is fine, though it merely seems like a pallet swap of last year’s livery, which itself was solid, if unspectacular. But even if one hates this livery, there is little doubt that Albon will drive it to its maximum potential, hopefully towards the podium.
[1] Red Bull released Albon for Williams seat but has ‘future options’, Luke Smith, Motorsport.com (9 September 2021) https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/red-bull-released-albon-for-williams-f1-seat-but-has-future-options/6662711/
[2] For example a podcast I would really recommend is, Alex Albon Exclusive: “I’m Ready To Win Championships”, High Performance, Youtube (27 November 2023) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ewi3HrvSPKw
[3] Emotional George Russell reacts to scoring first Williams points in Hungary!, Sky Sports F1, Youtube (2 August 2021) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f9ZwP4j_fHY
[4] Albon says P10 finish was ‘unimaginable’ before pulling off inspired strategy in Australia (11 April 2022) https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article.albon-says-p10-finish-was-unimaginable-before-pulling-off-inspired-strategy.23jsj951dn4F9raD9uoJ7I.html
[5] Albon proves a point by scoring them with Williams, Alex Baldwin, Reuters (25 May 2022) https://www.reuters.com/lifestyle/sports/albon-proves-point-by-scoring-them-with-williams-2022-05-25/
[6] Spa analysis: Five key factors in Alex Albon’s P10 finish, Williams Racing (29 August 2022) https://www.williamsf1.com/posts/0c9ba742-836b-4328-9c55-0851d19f0e64/spa-analysis-five-key-factors-in-alex-albon-p10
[7] Albon says he was ‘holding on for dear life’ to score final point in Belgium, (30 August 2022) https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article.albon-says-he-was-holding-on-for-dear-life-to-score-final-point-in-belgium.6KKqsElu3Px3dxB9usg47M.html
[8] Stats F1 https://www.statsf1.com/en/2023/espagne/championnat.aspx
[9] STRATEGY UNPACKED: How Albon beat a host of faster cars in Canada to seal Williams’ best result for 2 years, Bernie Collins (20 June 2023) https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article.strategy-unpacked-how-albon-beat-a-host-of-faster-cars-in-canada-to-seal.5y9R94fw5GfDDe5aTnl2mY.html
[10] Albon gets Driver of the Day with defensive masterclass, Reuters (18 June 2023) https://www.reuters.com/sports/motor-sports/albon-gets-driver-day-with-defensive-masterclass-2023-06-18/#:~:text=MONTREAL%2C%20June%2018%20(Reuters),Canadian%20Grand%20Prix%20on%20Sunday.
-
Haas have announced their livery today, evidently the most important news going on in F1 in the past few days. The livery itself is fine, like every Haas livery, it features a relatively bland but effective colour scheme. The position of logos on the front nose did stand out to me as well done, as they were notable enough to make me look at the logos, yet also not intrusive enough to clash with the livery. However, indications are that the performance of Haas may be all but fine.
Recent conversations have been focused on the surprise announcement that Team Principal Guenther Steiner was let go.[1] He has been replaced by former Trackside Engineering Director Ayao Komatsu. Komatsu has not been optimistic about the team’s short-term prospects, claiming that diverting resources to a late-season upgrade last year has put them on the backfoot.[2] In a recent interview, Komatsu said that he was ‘realistic with the car we’re putting out in Bahrain… Is it good enough? No.’[3] However, this pessimism seems to have not reached team owner Gene Haas. In his interview, Gene Haas said, ‘My biggest concern is when we go to Bahrain, we need to show up with a car that is ready to go.’[4] Despite characterizations that Komatsu got the job because he was willing to say whatever Gene wanted to hear, it appears that it took less than a week for the two to fundamentally contradict each other.[5] Whilst Komatsu has set realistic expectations, that the car needs development to compete, Gene Haas seems convinced that after the change in team principal, a change in the team’s fortunes should be on the horizon.
Which is indicative of the primary problem. Gene Haas appears to have little idea what is happening in the F1 team he owns.
This is a bold claim to make, with more evidence needed than two contradictory quotes. Further evidence is provided from the sacking of Guenther Steiner. The Race reported that the split occurred because Steiner believed that the team needed more capital investment, whilst Gene Haas believed that the team could compete, but was underperforming.[6] In a recent interview Steiner hinted that his and Gene’s views had diverged, stating that every other team has been using the opportunity the cost cap era presents to invest in the infrastructure of their teams.[7] Under the financial regulations, the teams are provided a Capital Expenditure allowance, which can be spent on developing facilities.[8] Every other F1 team realizes the importance of this. If a team invests successfully into upgrading their facilities, it will reduce costs the team will incur in developing their car. Thus, a team with better facilities can spend less money for the same results. The importance of capital expenditure spending is further highlighted by the recent decision to give extra boosts in the capital expenditure limit to the lower performing teams, providing Haas with an opportunity to develop their facilities faster than the larger teams.[9] Gene Haas, however, appears to not want the team to focus on investment. He claimed that the team’s primary problem was not spending money efficiently, specifically that their aero department is failing to let Haas’ cars achieve their potential.[10] There is some truth to this, as engineering can let Haas’ cars down. They have had a consistent problem, over multiple regulation sets, that the cars overheat the tyres and have higher degradation than the other teams. Haas could achieve more with a better engineering team. However, the last thing I would do if I believed that the engineering side of the team was letting the team down, would be to promote the Trackside Engineering Director to become the Team Principal. Yet this is exactly what Gene Haas did. This bizarre decision perfectly complements Gene’s indication that the team can either spend more efficiently in the short term or invest in the long term, rather than doing both. As every other F1 team has arrived at a different conclusion, this rather seems an excuse for Gene Haas to not invest more into his team.
Haas is in the rather unique position of having three sperate facilities. They have a factory in Banbury, a factory in Maranello and ‘a barely used but excellent ‘headquarters’ in the United States.’[11] Having three separate, distant facilities creates communication barriers within the team and can prevent a development of a singular clear vision, a vital element for any successful F1 team. Additionally, any team owner worried about the team spending their money efficiently should look at the heavily expensive facility that they barely use, yet Gene Haas declines to mention this in his interview.[12] Komatsu’s statements are even more disheartening, as whilst he recognizes that the team has fundamental issues with communication he states that they will always remain.[13] This heavily implies that, even if this issue has been bought up to him, Gene Haas is too dedicated to the three facility approach to consider a more compact way of running his team.
Gene Haas argued inn his interview that Haas’ partnership with Ferrari should be catapulting them further up in the F1 championship.[14] Haas buys and uses Ferrari hardware, Ferrari software and Ferrari engines and has a technical partnership with the team. Whilst I don’t doubt that Haas’ partnership with Ferrari improves their performance, having the right equipment does not make or break a team if they do not know how to use it. Ferrari’s hardware, software and engines are developed alongside Ferrari’s chassis and aero. Each single part of the car works in tandem to provide a clear vision and the maximum possible performance.[15] Haas, in comparison, have a chassis built by Dallara, yet another third party and a comparatively weak aero department. Thus, Haas has; as many parts as possible built by a third party, a chassis built by a third party, three separate facilities that cannot communicate effectively; an aero department that has to develop their aero around a car different people have made and a team boss that seems unwilling to invest. The more one reads into Haas’ business model, the more problems one finds. For Gene Haas to believe in the elements of a clearly flawed model beggars belief.
In conclusion, I have little hope for the Haas F1 team. It would be incredibly surprising to see the team finish higher than tenth, after reviewing all of these evident issues. Whilst other teams make mistakes, Haas is the only team in F1 that denies obvious investment opportunities to remain competitive, relies on outsourcing as their primary business model and has a team owner who seems unaware of the realities of competing in modern F1. In a week where an American team with a genuine desire to be competitive was rejected in F1, at least the growing American fanbase has a team finishing last to support.
[1] Guenther Steiner leaves role as Haas Team Principal with immediate effect as Ayao Komatsu promoted (10 January 2024) https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article.breaking-guenther-steiner-leaves-haas-team-principal-ayao-komatsu.EoHIsZH1SbRkJMSKJ8h3I.html
[2] ‘I’m not trying to be Guenther Steiner’ – Ayao Komatsu on Haas’s new chapter and their targets for the future, Lawrence Barretto (17 January 2024) https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article.ayao-komatsu-guenther-steiner-haas-team-principal-future.4OqNZMNtYAa1KaJXbTtRxr.html
[3] ‘I’m not trying to be Guenther Steiner’ – Ayao Komatsu on Haas’s new chapter and their targets for the future https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article.ayao-komatsu-guenther-steiner-haas-team-principal-future.4OqNZMNtYAa1KaJXbTtRxr.html
[4] EXCLUSIVE: ‘It came down to performance’ – Gene Haas on Guenther Steiner’s departure and what it means for his team’s future, Lawrence Barretto (11 January 2024) https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article.exclusive-gene-haas-guenther-steiner-departure-f1-team-future.3pt87IVfCzoOgJLV19Atf4.html
[5] The Disagreement Behind Steiner’s Shock Haas Split, The Race, Scott Mitchell-Mann (10 January 2024) https://www.the-race.com/formula-1/why-guenther-steiner-left-haas-f1-team/
[6] The Disagreement Behind Steiner’s Shock Haas Split, The Race https://www.the-race.com/formula-1/why-guenther-steiner-left-haas-f1-team/
[7] Guenther Steiner: Former Hass boss speaks out for first time on F1 exit and how it happened, Sky Sports (14 January 2024) https://www.skysports.com/f1/news/12433/13047484/guenther-steiner-former-hass-boss-speaks-out-for-first-time-on-f1-exit-and-how-it-happened#:~:text=Asked%20if%20that%20was%20a,teams%20%2D%20invested%20in%20the%20infrastructure
[8] The 2021 F1 cost cap explained – what has changed, and why?, Lawrence Barretto (27 May 2020) https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article.the-2021-f1-cost-cap-explained-what-has-changed-and-why.5O1Te8udKLmkUl4PyVZtUJ.html
[9] Formula One’s bottom four teams each get $20 million CapEx boost, Reuters (6 October 2023) https://www.reuters.com/sports/motor-sports/formula-ones-bottom-four-teams-each-get-20-mln-capex-boost-2023-10-06/
[10] EXCLUSIVE: ‘It came down to performance’ – Gene Haas on Guenther Steiner’s departure and what it means for his team’s future https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article.exclusive-gene-haas-guenther-steiner-departure-f1-team-future.3pt87IVfCzoOgJLV19Atf4.html
[11] The Disagreement Behind Steiner’s Shock Haas Split, The Race https://www.the-race.com/formula-1/why-guenther-steiner-left-haas-f1-team/
[12] EXCLUSIVE: ‘It came down to performance’ – Gene Haas on Guenther Steiner’s departure and what it means for his team’s future https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article.exclusive-gene-haas-guenther-steiner-departure-f1-team-future.3pt87IVfCzoOgJLV19Atf4.html
[13] ‘I’m not trying to be Guenther Steiner’ – Ayao Komatsu on Haas’s new chapter and their targets for the future https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article.ayao-komatsu-guenther-steiner-haas-team-principal-future.4OqNZMNtYAa1KaJXbTtRxr.html
[14] EXCLUSIVE: ‘It came down to performance’ – Gene Haas on Guenther Steiner’s departure and what it means for his team’s future https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article.exclusive-gene-haas-guenther-steiner-departure-f1-team-future.3pt87IVfCzoOgJLV19Atf4.html
[15] At least, in comparison to Haas.
-
The Spanish Grand Prix is moving to Madrid.[1] There’s so much about this event to excite fans. For those who care about sustainability, the track is only 16km from the city center, is being held in a convention center that uses 100% renewable energy, with all the race’s temporary structures to be built with recyclable materials.[2] If you want to go for a day trip, the track is only a five minute tram drive from Madrid’s airport.[3] Or if you plan a longer stay, you get to stay in Madrid, one of the most vibrant and fun cities in Europe. Having been to the Formula E race in London, I can also speak to the benefits of using a convention center to hold a race, it creates a far more welcoming, fun and relaxed experience than some traditional circuits can achieve, especially when trying to handle F1 crowds. On the topic of crowds, Madrid’s will be huge, with a capacity starting at 110,000, increasing to 140,000 at the end of the race’s contract.[4] Whilst there are usually complaints by fans when new street tracks are announced, I personally do not mind them. Whilst there needs to be a place for traditional racetracks on the F1 circuit, many of F1’s most interesting and varied tracks are street circuits.[5] There are countless positives to this event, one wonders what could possibly derail it.
Then one looks at the track layout.[6] Which looks abysmal.
According to the official F1 page, the track will feature ‘a mixture of slow, medium and fast corners… some long straights and big stops to promote overtaking.’[7] But looking at the layout, a better quote that comes to mind is ‘slow chicanes, slow chicanes and more slow chicanes.’ The start-finish straight is the only long straight in the track, albeit preceded by a couple of shorter straights. Whilst this straight does not appear long enough to promote overtaking on the straight itself, if a good corner proceeded it, then this could leave to overtakes. Unfortunately, the chicane at the end of the straight forces drivers to take two aggressive 90-degree turns, ruining the momentum achieved from the straight, making it incredibly difficult to pass. The next section of the track could have potential, if the cars could consistently follow through the Ribera Del Sena, to the Valdebebas Tunnel, to the 180-degree Valdebebas Curve, leading to a couple of corners that have some overtaking potential. Unfortunately, not one, but two small chicanes have been placed in this section. These two chicanes will most likely ruin the flow of this section, once again, making it more difficult to follow and overtake. Every overtaking opportunity looks like it will be immediately ruined by seemingly unnecessary chicanes, one of which appears to have been put in the track merely to accommodate a grandstand.
Yes, this event has potential. Yes, Madrid is a fantastic destination to hold an F1 race. And yes, if it’s affordable, I may even go for the experience. But the destination, experience and show should not come before the quality of the racing, which unfortunately, appears to be the case with this track.
[1] Though, the possibility has been kept open for Barcelona to stay on the calendar.
[2] Stefano Domenicali on Madrid joining the F1 calendar from 2026 and how sustainability is at the heart of the new venture, Lawrence Barretto (23 January 2024) https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article.stefano-domenicali-on-madrid-joining-the-f1-calendar-from-2026-and-how.2ikUYuraNv2lvQ9PimlHSA.html
[3] Madrid to join Formula 1 calendar from 2026 in new long-term deal (23 January 2024) https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article.madrid-formula-1-calendar-2026-spanish-grand-prix.rKwSPJ74MczwzDhHVxdQz.html
[4] Stefano Domenicali on Madrid joining the F1 calendar from 2026 and how sustainability is at the heart of the new venture https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article.stefano-domenicali-on-madrid-joining-the-f1-calendar-from-2026-and-how.2ikUYuraNv2lvQ9PimlHSA.html
[5] Think Monaco, Jeddah and Las Vegas to name a few examples.
[6] https://www.ifema.es/en/f1/circuit
[7] EXPLAINED: Your key questions answered as Madrid joins the F1 calendar from 2026, Lawrence Barretto (23 January 2024) https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article.explained-your-key-questions-answered-as-madrid-joins-the-f1-calendar-from.2Vf9fUmHi3P7QQW9T6NSZj.html
-
I had a pretty solid plan to lay a foundation for this blog. Find out when every team will release their livery and plan an article about a topic relating to that team, along with feedback on their livery. Unfortunately, ever the adept marketeers, McLaren surprised us all, by releasing their livery without giving me a forewarning.[1] The livery itself is beautiful. I have not been a fan of the last couple McLaren liveries, feeling that the light blue colours used fundamentally clashed with the papaya. Seeing the ‘Stealth’ livery last year, I saw it as having far more potential. It appears that the livery designer thought so as well, ditching the blue for a sleek, modern, orange and black colour scheme. Now their car has the intimidating look of a tiger, ready to hunt down and strike the opposition.
Not only does the team possess a fast looking livery, but there is optimism coming out of the team that the car may follow suit, with both McLaren CEO Zak Brown and Team Principal Andrea Stella feeling that Lando Norris may win his first race this year, though remaining cautious about the possibility of continuing Red Bull domination.[2] But, looking at McLaren’s development last season, there is reason to feel optimistic.
McLaren began last year abysmally, with Zak Brown admitting after the pre-season test that they had ‘set some goals for development which we didn’t hit.’[3] The team only scored points in three of the opening eight races, with a best result of 6th in Australia. But in season developments proved strong, with Norris instantly impressing with a 4th place finish in Austria. From thence, the team became a regular contender for podiums and even bagged a sprint race win in Qatar, thanks to their impressive rookie driver, Oscar Piastri. McLaren expect this development to continue, with Brown stating that ‘we’re feeling good about our development’ and Stella believing ‘when it comes to the wind tunnel development or CFD development we see that the gradient we established last year that led to the Austria development and then the Singapore development – it seems we can maintain it.’[4] Max Verstappen also seems phased by McLaren’s trajectory, implying in a recent podcast that he sees them as his greatest rivals next season.[5]
However, a short view to McLaren’s recent past tempers the all-encompassing hype they are receiving at present.
In 2021, McLaren had a solid season, with Lando becoming a regular podium finisher, spending the early part of the season fighting for third in the championship and Daniel Ricciardo winning McLaren’s first race since 2012. The team was, therefore, ambitious heading into the new rule cycle in 2022.[6] Whilst they believed that their return to the front was still a few years away, they hoped to continue achieving podiums, possibly wins and set a target to get more average points per race than in 2021.[7] Zak Brown was confident that the team he had built was ‘the team of people which will ultimately get us back to the front’ and after the first test in Barcelona, Ricciardo described it as ‘a pretty flawless three days for the team.’[8] It did not take long for this bullishness to fade, with McLaren ruing brake issues in the Bahrain pre-season test and after the first race the car was criticized by Ricciardo for being a ‘long way’ from the podium and lacking straight line speed.[9] Whilst not achieving as substantial a turnaround as they would in 2023, McLaren did develop, being near the top of the midfield by the year’s end. Whilst McLaren are perhaps more remembered last season for admitting to missing their targets, this admission only came after the Bahrain pre-season test, the exact same point where the problems arose in 2022. Before then, outgoing team boss Andrea Seidl expressed optimism that McLaren’s development path put them on track to begin to take the fight to the big teams in 2023 and Zak Brown stated at the car launch that ‘We learnt a lot [from 2022] which has been taken into the off-season as the entire team works hard to prepare for another year.[10] Yet despite this optimism, once preseason testing began last year, McLaren found themselves in an even worse position than in 2022.
Does this mean that I think McLaren will find themselves in the same position for the third year in a row? No, I find this unlikely. But I believe that fans need to hit the brakes on predictions of McLaren taking the fight to Red Bull or being the clear second-best team. Even in their season post-Austria, McLaren were capable of performance deficits, such as setting up their car with far too much downforce in Belgium, or being completely off the pace in Las Vegas.[11] Additionally, McLaren have a difficult car to drive, even when it’s fast, drivers find they constantly have to drive it on the limit, leading to mistakes being made more easily.[12] False dawns happen in F1 all the time and the short-term thinking that envisions immediate success for McLaren is the same thinking that led many fans to believing that Alonso would definitely get his 33rd win last year. Whilst there are many factors, such as the lack in regulation changes, one of the best driver line ups in F1 or the impressive development McLaren made last year, that make it likely that McLaren will continue to rise, these same factors were present last year and the team initially fell back. Whilst there is hope for many McLaren fans, fans should not rule out Ferrari or Mercedes in being the team that gets closest to Red Bull next year. These teams have a recent proven track record of wins and success that McLaren doesn’t yet have. As much as all fans want to see this beautiful car fighting at the front, my reservation causes me to temper my hype, at least until predictions of success translate into poles and race wins. But if this tiger does get hunting, no doubt most fans want to see it chasing down a couple of bulls.
[1] McLaren become first F1 team to unveil 2024 look with new livery revealed (16 January 2024) https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article.mclaren-new-livery-reveal-2024-f1-season.216OAbbqt6SWUjIio6GLqP.html
[2] ‘He is ready’: McLaren hopeful Lando Norris can claim first F1 win in 2024, Giles Richards, The Guardian (16 January 2024) https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2024/jan/16/he-is-ready-mclaren-hopeful-lando-norris-can-claim-first-f1-win-in-2024
[3] F1 team bosses reveal pecking order predictions as McLaren admit they’ve missed ‘projected targets’ (24 February 2023) https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article.f1-team-bosses-reveal-pecking-order-predictions-as-mclaren-admit-theyve.6UlcuKUciwSzl6pngGid1q.html
[4] Brown sets clear McLaren target for start of 2024 as he says team are ‘feeling good about development’ (3 January 2024) https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article.brown-sets-clear-mclaren-target-for-start-of-2024-as-he-says-team-are.3cFyWmIoyl99s0xLS5kbZP.html; ANALYSIS: As McLaren reveal their new livery, are they the team set to take the fight to Red Bull in 2024?, Lawrence Barretto (16 January 2024) https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article.analysis-as-mclaren-reveal-their-new-livery-are-they-the-team-set-to-take.2AI3XI0SyxGIIzowJtYUzm.html
[5] Max and Checo Reflect On The 2023 F1 Season | Talking Bull (20 December 2023) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yj55KGOZcvM
[6] McLaren showcase bold new livery as they reveal 2022 challenger, the MCL36 (11 February 2022) https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article.breaking-mclaren-showcase-bold-new-livery-as-they-reveal-2022-challenger-the.5etd9Tgo3ivFuzQIJFNt5r.html; ‘It’s definitely a big opportunity’ says Norris as McLaren reveal 2022-spec MCL36 (11 February 2022) https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article.its-definitely-a-big-opportunity-says-norris-as-mclaren-reveal-2022-spec.6obJepiNy4cj0sKEZl270s.html
[7] Why McLaren are ambitious but realistic about 2022 prospects, Lawrence Barretto (11 February 2022) https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article.why-mclaren-are-ambitious-but-realistic-about-2022-prospects.14JZh8h7sE2P6Xsd37J90M.html, This prediction was ultimately nowhere close to happening, with McLaren achieving an average of 7.2 points per race in 2022, compared to 12.5 in 2021.
[8] Why McLaren are ambitious but realistic about 2022 prospects https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article.why-mclaren-are-ambitious-but-realistic-about-2022-prospects.14JZh8h7sE2P6Xsd37J90M.html This quote from Zak Brown doesn’t play well in hindsight, as only a year later, both Team Principal Andreas Seidl and Technical Director James Key had gone and McLaren committed to reshuffling their technical department; Ricciardo says McLaren executed a ‘pretty flawless’ pre-season programme in Spain (28 February 2022) https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article.ricciardo-says-mclaren-executed-a-pretty-flawless-pre-season-programme-in.FoWfPSUqPS6NzlGOPwDIk.html
[9] Norris says brake problems have hampered McLaren in Bahrain testing – and warns ‘it’s not going to be an easy fix’ (11 March 2022) https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article.norris-says-brake-problem-has-hampered-mclaren-and-warns-its-not-going-to-be.439p3EASA6iWBBhLHysTQ2.html; ‘We don’t have a good enough car’ – McLaren drivers downbeat after point-less Bahrain GP showing (22 March 2022) https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article.we-dont-have-a-good-enough-car-mclaren-drivers-downbeat-after-point-less.8dC2f5adzc7p6MLF3rUgK.html
[10] ‘I see a lot of positives’ – Seidl proud of McLaren’s progress in his final year in charge (16 December 2022) https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article.i-see-a-lot-of-positives-seidl-proud-of-mclarens-progress-in-his-final-year.50x6QaAUzjBYCwYa7azzXi.html; FIRST LOOK: McLaren present vibrant-looking MCL60 to kick off 2023 anniversary year (13 February 2023) https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article.first-look-mclaren-present-vibrant-looking-mcl60-to-kick-off-2023.5gnCsx6H01YFs97JlP4ax5.html
[11] ‘It was painful’ – Norris describes McLaren’s straight-line speed struggles after surprise P7 finish in Belgium (31 July 2023) https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article.it-was-painful-norris-describes-mclarens-straight-line-speed-struggles-after.1d1xbX04BVyD5iXDr2FLBr.html; Norris labels Las Vegas qualifying a ‘reality check’ after double Q1 exit for McLaren (18 November 2023) https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article.norris-labels-las-vegas-qualifying-a-reality-check-after-double-q1-exit-for.6LiN0GbBk5qWJD3UN8WNqJ.html
[12] Norris says he understands ‘certain parts’ of Ricciardo’s struggles with McLaren in 2022 (15 July 2022) https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article.norris-says-he-understands-certain-parts-of-ricciardos-struggles-with.646UD3WYQxUGdH66c6k6p0.html; Norris admits MCL36 is ‘unsuited’ to his driving style, but eyes long-term success with McLaren (22 September 2022) https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article.norris-admits-mcl36-is-unsuited-to-his-driving-style-but-eyes-long-term.2EkbfuEMtuRjuQbqeu1ncF.html, These consistent struggles, expressed by drivers like Norris, Sainz and Ricciardo, perhaps help to explain the crucial mistakes made in a few qualifying sessions by Lando last year, at races where it was possible to challenge for the win. If drivers are provided with a car that is difficult to drive on the limit, they will naturally make more mistakes, even if they are incredibly talented.
Ryan's Lil' F1 Blog 